Simulated portfolio. Everything here is a simulated case study using synthetic data about a fictional company. It is not client work, a real audit, a certification or an assurance opinion.
ASSURANCE: GRC, IT audit, technology risk

ITGC audit / Workpaper

Workpaper T-11: NS-CHG-03

Simulated. Fictional company; synthetic data; no real audit.

SIMULATED. Fictional company Northstar Financial Technologies; synthetic data; no real audit.

Field Value
Control NS-CHG-03
Objective The deployer of a production change is not its developer.
Audit period 2026-01-01 to 2026-06-30
Population 91 Normal and Emergency changes (Normal and Emergency changes)
Method None: 100% of the population tested by script
Evidence n/a (see evidence register)
Rule(s) applied R-CHG-04
Preparer Audit analyst (simulated)
Reviewer Audit Manager (simulated role)

Selection rationale

The full population was tested by script because the evidence is a complete system export and scripted re-performance costs no more than sampling. No sample was drawn, so there is no sampling error and no statistical assurance is claimed. Source tickets and screenshots behind each record were not inspected (synthetic data); in a real engagement a risk-based sample of source records would be inspected as well. Selected records: the whole population; exceptions are listed below.

Pass / fail / inconclusive criteria

Pass: exceptions are within the tolerable deviation rate. Fail: exceptions exceed it. Inconclusive: the evidence is incomplete or unreliable, so a conclusion cannot be supported (does not apply to this test).

Steps

  1. Compare deployer with developer for each change.

Expected result

Deployer differs from developer for every change. Tolerable deviation: 0%.

Result

4 of 91 Normal and Emergency changes failed (4.4%)

Conclusion: Not operating effectively

Limitations

No code-review evidence was in scope for this test; see NS-SDL-01 (not tested).

Exceptions (4)

Rule Record Detail
R-CHG-04 CHG-0012 SYS-01 Emergency change deployed by its developer E0077
R-CHG-04 CHG-0050 SYS-02 Normal change deployed by its developer E0211
R-CHG-04 CHG-0074 SYS-03 Normal change deployed by its developer E0300
R-CHG-04 CHG-0116 SYS-05 Normal change deployed by its developer E0272

Reviewer notes

Reviewer role is simulated. This workpaper has not been independently reviewed by a human; the 'reviewer' field records who would review it in a real engagement.

Re-performance

Re-run with docker run --rm -v "$PWD":/work assurance-build python scripts/itgc_audit.py. Output is deterministic for the committed data.

Control tests (CSV) · Back to findings